Template talk:Infobox regtemp: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Re
Line 6: Line 6:


: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
:: Imo these should simply be ''ET join'' and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (''not'' *5 & 17). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:33, 28 June 2025

Non-octave stuff

This is a bit of a nit, but would be nice if the box said 'edt join' instead 'edo join' for tritave temperaments (and similarly for other equaves). See e.g. Mintaka. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

What would be chosen as the equave? -- VectorGraphics (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Imo these should simply be ET join and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (not *5 & 17). FloraC (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)