116edo: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ET}} | {{Infobox ET}} | ||
{{ | {{ED intro}} | ||
116edo is only [[consistent]] to the [[5-odd-limit]], and is not quite accurate for its size. It can be viewed as splitting [[58edo]]'s step in two, and the [[enfactoring|enfactored]] 116cef [[val]] comes out on top accuracy in the 7-, 11-, and 13-limit. In the 5-limit, however, the [[patent val]] {{val| 116 184 '''269''' }} beats the enfactored 116c val {{val| 116 184 '''270''' }} by a thin margin, and it [[Tempering out|tempers out]] 20000/19683 ([[tetracot comma]]) and 2197265625/2147483648 (wizard comma). | 116edo is only [[consistent]] to the [[5-odd-limit]], and is not quite accurate for its size. It can be viewed as splitting [[58edo]]'s step in two, and the [[enfactoring|enfactored]] 116cef [[val]] comes out on top accuracy in the 7-, 11-, and 13-limit. In the 5-limit, however, the [[patent val]] {{val| 116 184 '''269''' }} beats the enfactored 116c val {{val| 116 184 '''270''' }} by a thin margin, and it [[Tempering out|tempers out]] 20000/19683 ([[tetracot comma]]) and 2197265625/2147483648 (wizard comma). | ||