37th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox fractional-octave|37}}
[[37edo]] has an extremely precise mapping for the 11th harmonic, and it is a strong 2.5.7.13 tuning besides that, therefore various 37th-octave temperaments occur naturally between any two numbers whose greatest common divisor is 37.
[[37edo]] has an extremely precise mapping for the 11th harmonic, and it is a strong 2.5.7.13 tuning besides that, therefore various 37th-octave temperaments occur naturally between any two numbers whose greatest common divisor is 37.
== 37-11-commatic (rank-1) ==
{{Main|37-11-comma}}
Subgroup: 2.11
Comma list: {{monzo|128 -37}}
{{mapping|legend=2| 37 28 }}
: mapping generators: ~35184372088832/34522712143931 = 1\37
[[Support]]ing [[ET]]s: 37N, N = 1 to 485


== Rubidium ==
== Rubidium ==
Line 137: Line 150:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|296, 1369, 1665}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|296, 1369, 1665}}, ...


[[Category:37edo]]
{{Navbox fractional-octave}}
[[Category:Rank 2]]
[[Category:Temperament collections]]