Varunismic temperaments: Difference between revisions

m -category as agreed upon
Xenllium (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 }}]


Vals: {{Val list| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}
Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}


Badness: 0.046447
Badness: 0.046447
Line 54: Line 54:
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 31 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 -38 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 31 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 -38 }}]


Vals: {{Val list| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}
Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}


Badness: 0.026107
Badness: 0.026107
Line 82: Line 82:
POTE generator: ~121/84 = 633.755
POTE generator: ~121/84 = 633.755


Vals: {{Val list| 32c, 72, 176, 248, 320 }}
Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 32c, 72, 176, 248, 320 }}


Badness: 0.030159
Badness: 0.030159
Line 95: Line 95:
POTE generator: ~75/52 = 633.742
POTE generator: ~75/52 = 633.742


Vals: {{Val list| 72, 176f, 248, 320 }}
Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 72, 176f, 248, 320 }}


Badness: 0.027632
Badness: 0.027632
Line 108: Line 108:
POTE generator: ~13/9 = 633.8370
POTE generator: ~13/9 = 633.8370


Vals: {{Val list| 32cf, 72, 176, 248f }}
Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 32cf, 72, 176, 248f }}


Badness: 0.030192
Badness: 0.030192