OD: Difference between revisions
m Categories |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) fix section capitalization |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Relationship to other tunings == | == Relationship to other tunings == | ||
=== | === Vs. ED === | ||
It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch, or 12-EDO — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-UDO. | It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch, or 12-EDO — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-UDO. | ||
=== | === Vs. EFD === | ||
The only difference between n-ODp and n-EFDp is that the p for an [[EFD|EFD (equal frequency division)]] is irrational, and therefore its pitches and intervals are all irrational too. | The only difference between n-ODp and n-EFDp is that the p for an [[EFD|EFD (equal frequency division)]] is irrational, and therefore its pitches and intervals are all irrational too. | ||
=== | === Vs. ADO === | ||
The nth [[Overtone scale|overtone mode, or over-n scale]] is equivalent to n-ODO. So is n-[[ADO]]. | The nth [[Overtone scale|overtone mode, or over-n scale]] is equivalent to n-ODO. So is n-[[ADO]]. | ||
=== | === Vs. OS === | ||
Any ODO will be equivalent to some [[OS|OS (otonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4. | Any ODO will be equivalent to some [[OS|OS (otonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4. | ||
=== | === Vs. UD === | ||
The equivalent utonal version of an OD is a [[UD|UD (utonal sequence)]]. | The equivalent utonal version of an OD is a [[UD|UD (utonal sequence)]]. | ||