Godtone
Joined 17 December 2020
m →Comment on Your Proposal: added context for Aura's comments |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Comment on your proposal on EDO subgroups == | == Comment on your proposal on EDO subgroups == | ||
For reference, [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Things_to_do#Set_a_semi-objective_standard_for_classifying_edos_as_subgroup_temperaments|here is the proposal]]. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 04:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | For reference, [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Things_to_do#Set_a_semi-objective_standard_for_classifying_edos_as_subgroup_temperaments|here is the proposal]]. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 04:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Yes, I read that. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
I don't know about you, but when it comes to picking EDOs based on Subgroups, I'm actually kind of big on something I call "[[telicity]]". While I admit that I haven't managed to express the concept very well as of yet, perhaps we could talk about this and clarify the concept, as I'd like to see this sort of thing mentioned in terms of how well an EDO approximates a given subgroup structure-wise. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | I don't know about you, but when it comes to picking EDOs based on Subgroups, I'm actually kind of big on something I call "[[telicity]]". While I admit that I haven't managed to express the concept very well as of yet, perhaps we could talk about this and clarify the concept, as I'd like to see this sort of thing mentioned in terms of how well an EDO approximates a given subgroup structure-wise. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC) | ||