Talk:Ainismic chords: Difference between revisions
→Structure: re |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
: It's confusingly written. Anyway, the problem of your addition was that you didn't notice the notion is based on odd limits (not prime limits), so intervals like 44/39 is not considered "17-limit". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC) | : It's confusingly written. Anyway, the problem of your addition was that you didn't notice the notion is based on odd limits (not prime limits), so intervals like 44/39 is not considered "17-limit". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the [[dyadic chord]] article? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:15, 30 December 2020
Questions
Shouldn't it be 1-13/11-17/12 which has steps 13/11-6/5-24/17, and shouldn't 1-6/5-17/12 which has steps 6/5-13/11-24/17? I'm asking because tempering out the ainos comma equates 17/12 with 78/55, 17/9 with 104/55, and 26/17 with 55/36, and, judging from the others on the list, the last steps should basically close the chord at the octave. Sorry, I had this wrong in earlier versions of this comment --Aura (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Structure
From my perspective this article is unreadable. Maybe text is the wrong tool to express its intention? --Xenwolf (talk) 20:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I wasn't sure how to style an article like this, and so I figured that I'd mimic the structure of some of the other articles on specific essentially tempered chord types. Apparently that didn't work to well. --Aura (talk) 23:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- It's much better now with a list. Maybe also the repeating parts could be cut. I also tried to build a table from it which turned out to be not as good as I expected. Maybe there is a better way of presenting chords and steps but I have to admit that this is not easy in wikitext. --Xenwolf (talk) 12:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Essentially Tempered Chords
I have to admit that the definition of "Essentially Tempered Chords" kind of flew over my head when I read it the first time. --Aura (talk) 05:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
I tried reading again, and it still flies over my head. --Aura (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- It's confusingly written. Anyway, the problem of your addition was that you didn't notice the notion is based on odd limits (not prime limits), so intervals like 44/39 is not considered "17-limit". FloraC (talk) 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the dyadic chord article? --Xenwolf (talk) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)