Template talk:Todo: Difference between revisions

Line 42:

The box itself looks quite good. Sometimes it's too much if there is a tiny detail to do. I could imagine that we control this by user CSS (or group CSS). In cases where an article ha a lot to do, it could definitively help to make it visible to all visitors. But what about little things that you notice in passing and want to reserve for later, since you are currently busy with something bigger? Do they justify severe losses in the appearance of the article? In these cases I would prefer a marker invisible in the article text itself. I'm sorry that I'm only telling you this now, I just didn't realize it before, but now that I've tried your template in my sandbox it's clear to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

: It’s alright! I thought about something like that yesterday too when infoboxifying intervals pages: sometimes indeed you see something minor but don’t want to go all on, or don’t know how it can be made better, like more a question for others: “have you seen this? is this good enough?”.

: For an invisible marker, I immediately have an idea: just add an argument <code>invisible</code> and if it’s nonempty, then the template would add just categories (and maybe an empty <code>span</code> with a special class, so you can see it in the rendered page code if some need arises? and better a HTML comment inside it, with category names and the description). How do you find it? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 14:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 The box itself looks quite good. Sometimes it's too much if there is a tiny detail to do. I could imagine that we control this by user CSS (or group CSS). In cases where an article ha a lot to do, it could definitively help to make it visible to all visitors. But what about little things that you notice in passing and want to reserve for later, since you are currently busy with something bigger? Do they justify severe losses in the appearance of the article? In these cases I would prefer a marker invisible in the article text itself. I'm sorry that I'm only telling you this now, I just didn't realize it before, but now that I've tried your template in my sandbox it's clear to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
+: It’s alright! I thought about something like that yesterday too when infoboxifying intervals pages: sometimes indeed you see something minor but don’t want to go all on, or don’t know how it can be made better, like more a question for others: “have you seen this? is this good enough?”.
+: For an invisible marker, I immediately have an idea: just add an argument <code>invisible</code> and if it’s nonempty, then the template would add just categories (and maybe an empty <code>span</code> with a special class, so you can see it in the rendered page code if some need arises? and better a HTML comment inside it, with category names and the description). How do you find it? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 14:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)