User talk:Aura/Aura's Ideas on Tonality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Interval table: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
instead of writing <code>11*3/2*10</code> which most people will read as multiplication, use <code>11^3/2^10</code> or <code>11**3/2**10</code> or <code>11<sup>3</sup>/2<sup>10</sup></code>. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC) | instead of writing <code>11*3/2*10</code> which most people will read as multiplication, use <code>11^3/2^10</code> or <code>11**3/2**10</code> or <code>11<sup>3</sup>/2<sup>10</sup></code>. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks! I'm in the process of correcting stuff to make the system more consistent right now, so I'll get to this in a bit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Interval table == | == Interval table == | ||
Line 143: | Line 145: | ||
Hope that helps. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC) | Hope that helps. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: While one one hand, it does help, on the other hand, the need to fix the consistency issues with names is a factor at play right now. Furthermore, I have discovered that there are more intervals that need to be added to the list. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:40, 18 October 2020
exponential syntax
instead of writing 11*3/2*10
which most people will read as multiplication, use 11^3/2^10
or 11**3/2**10
or 113/210
. --Xenwolf (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm in the process of correcting stuff to make the system more consistent right now, so I'll get to this in a bit. --Aura (talk) 19:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Interval table
I'd say that adding interval sizes could be of use, even cent precision would do, something like this:
Ratio | Cents | Interval Name(s) |
---|---|---|
33/32 | 53 | Alpharabian Superprime, Alpharabian Parachromatic Quartertone, al-Farabi Quartertone |
1089/1024 | 107 | Alpharabian Augmented Unison, Alpharabian Chromatic Semitone |
4096/3993 | 44 | Alpharabian Subminor Second, Alpharabian Paradiatonic Quartertone |
128/121 | 97 | Alpharabian Minor Second, Alpharabian Diatonic Semitone |
12/11 | 151 | Lesser Alpharabian Neutral Second |
88/81 | 143 | Greater Alpharabian Neutral Second |
297/256 | 257 | Alpharabian Supermajor Second |
1024/891 | 241 | Alpharabian Subminor Third |
144/121 | 301 | Alpharabian Minor Third |
11/9 | 347 | Lesser Alpharabian Neutral Third |
27/22 | 355 | Greater Alpharabian Neutral Third |
121/96 | 401 | Alpharabian Major Third |
2673/2048 | 461 | Alpharabian Supermajor Third |
128/99 | 445 | Alpharabian Paraminor Fourth |
11/8 | 551 | Alpharabian Paramajor Fourth, Just Paramajor Fourth |
363/256 | 605 | Alpharabian Augmented Fourth |
512/363 | 595 | Alpharabian Diminished Fifth |
16/11 | 649 | Alpharabian Paraminor Fifth, Just Paraminor Fifth |
99/64 | 755 | Alpharabian Paramajor Fifth |
4096/2673 | 739 | Alpharabian Subminor Sixth |
192/121 | 799 | Alpharabian Minor Sixth |
44/27 | 845 | Lesser Alpharabian Neutral Sixth |
18/11 | 853 | Greater Alpharabian Neutral Sixth |
121/72 | 899 | Alpharabian Major Sixth |
891/512 | 959 | Alpharabian Supermajor Sixth |
512/297 | 943 | Alpharabian Subminor Seventh |
81/44 | 1057 | Lesser Alpharabian Neutral Seventh |
11/6 | 1049 | Greater Alpharabian Neutral Seventh |
121/64 | 1103 | Alpharabian Major Seventh |
3993/2048 | 1156 | Alpharabian Supermajor Seventh |
2401/1089 | 1369 | Alpharabian Diminished Octave |
64/33 | 1147 | Alpharabian Suboctave |
Hope that helps. --Xenwolf (talk) 19:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)