Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

Line 25:

:::: No problem, I'm still open to improvement. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Okay, so, after what Kite said, and given my thoughts on the Rastma being a potential JI basis for the single step of 159edo, I'm thinking we ought to replace the dart glyphs entirely, and use a different combining glyph to represent the Rastma as a single step of 159edo, with the double step and quadruple step of 159edo being represented by syntonic-modified accidentals that are further modified ~~the~~ the combining element representing the Rastma. On another note, I think we can relegate the Septimal comma symbols and 13-limit accidentals to being optional, that way, people who want to keep the system more simple can do so. If need be, we can always ask the people who make new versions of Helmholtz-Ellis notation to separate the syntonic comma modifiers from the other accidental symbols, and we can go from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Okay, so, after what Kite said, and given my thoughts on the Rastma being a potential JI basis for the single step of 159edo, I'm thinking we ought to replace the dart glyphs entirely, and use a different combining glyph to represent the Rastma as a single step of 159edo, with the double step and quadruple step of 159edo being represented by syntonic-modified accidentals that are further modified by the combining element representing the Rastma. On another note, I think we can relegate the Septimal comma symbols and 13-limit accidentals to being optional, that way, people who want to keep the system more simple can do so. If need be, we can always ask the people who make new versions of Helmholtz-Ellis notation to separate the syntonic comma modifiers from the other accidental symbols, and we can go from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

== Kite's proposal for 159edo notation ==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 :::: No problem, I'm still open to improvement. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
-Okay, so, after what Kite said, and given my thoughts on the Rastma being a potential JI basis for the single step of 159edo, I'm thinking we ought to replace the dart glyphs entirely, and use a different combining glyph to represent the Rastma as a single step of 159edo, with the double step and quadruple step of 159edo being represented by syntonic-modified accidentals that are further modified the the combining element representing the Rastma.  On another note, I think we can relegate the Septimal comma symbols and 13-limit accidentals to being optional, that way, people who want to keep the system more simple can do so.  If need be, we can always ask the people who make new versions of Helmholtz-Ellis notation to separate the syntonic comma modifiers from the other accidental symbols, and we can go from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
+Okay, so, after what Kite said, and given my thoughts on the Rastma being a potential JI basis for the single step of 159edo, I'm thinking we ought to replace the dart glyphs entirely, and use a different combining glyph to represent the Rastma as a single step of 159edo, with the double step and quadruple step of 159edo being represented by syntonic-modified accidentals that are further modified by the combining element representing the Rastma.  On another note, I think we can relegate the Septimal comma symbols and 13-limit accidentals to being optional, that way, people who want to keep the system more simple can do so.  If need be, we can always ask the people who make new versions of Helmholtz-Ellis notation to separate the syntonic comma modifiers from the other accidental symbols, and we can go from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 == Kite's proposal for 159edo notation ==