Talk:33/32: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 16:26, 18 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:39, 18 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:::: I understand being inconsistent in edits to leave space for feedback and you are right in doing so. However, it is also true that the listings as Third, Forth and so on do tend to reflect on their musical function, at least as far as I can see in light of my background as a composer. (comment posted and modified by --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC))		:::: I understand being inconsistent in edits to leave space for feedback and you are right in doing so. However, it is also true that the listings as Third, Forth and so on do tend to reflect on their musical function, at least as far as I can see in light of my background as a composer. (comment posted and modified by --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC))

			:::: For the record, I can see keeping the listings of Prime, Second, Third and Forth and such as size listings, since that is how many microtonal composers from a background like mine tend to measure interval size. However, in the end, one of my main concerns in naming intervals- and even in coming up with the musical function map- is making things more accessible for microtonal composers with my type of background, while bridging to strikingly new areas. Yes, this means coming up with new terminology in some respects. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)