Talk:Relative errors of small EDOs: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
(No difference)

Revision as of 11:58, 15 May 2020

(WIP) Relative Errors of Small Edos

I did a change to the upper table to right-align the numbers, I hope that's okay. Here some (hopefully helpful) suggestions:

  • leave out the repetitive /1 in the headings
  • leave out the column for prime 2
  • switch from permille with one decimal place to the more common percent with two decimal places

Best regards --Xenwolf (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

> right-align
Thx. No idea how you did it.
> leave out the repetitive /1 in the headings
> leave out the column for prime 2
Although this article is about edos, the method is valid for all rank-1 temperaments. For non-octave temperaments, the errors of, for example, 3/1 and 3/2 are different. Maybe I'll do ed3, ed5, etc. in the future. That's the reason why the /1 and prime 2 are there.
> percent
I'll do the switch after I fill it all up to see if it looks better. FloraC (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Maybe I can help you with this, I'm a professional programmer who can automate this with Perl or Python. I'd also hand you the script for further adaption then ... Please tell me if this sounds right to you. --Xenwolf (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Nice.
I don't suppose your script generates those values (cuz I did so in C), just doing with the table, right? FloraC (talk) 02:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Such a script would also generate the values. --Xenwolf (talk) 05:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)