Xenharmonic Wiki:Bugs: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
** If we want to go this route, maybe it makes more sense to remove them as pages, and upload them as files? Essentially these .scl things are config files for Scala, not wiki pages. There could be a wiki page which contains a directory of uploaded .scl files including descriptions, related pages, etc. Someone can always make a wiki page about a scale which links to an .scl file, if they want to. [[User:Tyler|Tyler]] ([[User talk:Tyler|talk]]) 12:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | ** If we want to go this route, maybe it makes more sense to remove them as pages, and upload them as files? Essentially these .scl things are config files for Scala, not wiki pages. There could be a wiki page which contains a directory of uploaded .scl files including descriptions, related pages, etc. Someone can always make a wiki page about a scale which links to an .scl file, if they want to. [[User:Tyler|Tyler]] ([[User talk:Tyler|talk]]) 12:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
*** Whatever we do, I think the main use case should be on making it easy for people to create and add new Scala files the "right way" (whatever we decide that is), in the future. [[User:Battaglia01|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Battaglia01|talk]]) 16:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | *** Whatever we do, I think the main use case should be on making it easy for people to create and add new Scala files the "right way" (whatever we decide that is), in the future. [[User:Battaglia01|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Battaglia01|talk]]) 16:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
* Organized thought: how about handling of .scl in a way similar to .svg, and have a way of rendering it in-browser as a text list (and maybe even eventually audio clips)? This is also a vote against having .scl-only pages, and instead converting those to files. | |||
=== Move Spanish pages to es.xen.wiki === | === Move Spanish pages to es.xen.wiki === | ||