Talk:Septischismic family: Difference between revisions
m technicality of sense correction |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:: Is there a reason to dual-name this? Like references or existing music written in it? If not, I don't see why we can't interpret the result at face value. There's not many votes cuz not many ppl care. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:28, 28 August 2026 (UTC) | :: Is there a reason to dual-name this? Like references or existing music written in it? If not, I don't see why we can't interpret the result at face value. There's not many votes cuz not many ppl care. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:28, 28 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::My main reason is that barely anybody voiced their opinions here, and because of that I don't see it as representative of the community as a whole, so for now I do not support deprecating garischisma/mic. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 14:16, 28 August 2026 (UTC) | |||
::: My main reason is that barely anybody voiced their opinions here, and because of that I don't see it as representative of the community as a whole, so for now I do not support deprecating garischisma/mic. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 14:16, 28 August 2026 (UTC) | |||
: I'd like to note generally that I'm against renames if there isn't actually a reason for the rename as per [[Temperament naming#Contemporary rules]], as the names only serve to be convenient shorthands for referring to mappings ultimately. If you decide to keep the new name, can we rename [[Fokkertone]] to smth else? (It was formerly called tridecimal meantone, but I do agree it's not the canonical extension of undecimal meantone, but I'm gonna be honest and say I don't like using this name aesthetically, and this seems (in a sense) to be an aesthetical rename too so...) --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 14:14, 29 August 2026 (UTC) | : I'd like to note generally that I'm against renames if there isn't actually a reason for the rename as per [[Temperament naming#Contemporary rules]], as the names only serve to be convenient shorthands for referring to mappings ultimately. If you decide to keep the new name, can we rename [[Fokkertone]] to smth else? (It was formerly called tridecimal meantone, but I do agree it's not the canonical extension of undecimal meantone, but I'm gonna be honest and say I don't like using this name aesthetically, and this seems (in a sense) to be an aesthetical rename too so...) --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 14:14, 29 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: I'll cite the following rule for the rename of this comma, in which regard the new name demonstrates clear improvement: | |||
:: > The [new] name has reasoning behind it that identifies it as appropriate at least insofar as it identifies the comma as unique within reason. | |||
:: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:47, 29 August 2026 (UTC) | |||