Talk:Schismatic family: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 18:48, 22 January 2026 view source Eufalesio (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 901 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:59, 22 January 2026 view source Eufalesio (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 901 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. ~~At first,~~ I ~~put~~ it as 2.3.5.13 because ~~it's much better there (so much so that Pythagorean tuning is a possible tuning for this temp) than at~~ 2.3.5.~~11(~~.~~13)~~. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)