Dual-fifth temperaments: Difference between revisions

Xenllium (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Xenllium (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
For example, "dual-3 sixix" is a 2.3⁻.9.5 temperament with an optimal [[generator]] around 335.8¢ (optimizing only the 2.9.5 portion of the subgroup). Two generators up make the flat fifth, and five generators down make the flat fourth. Hence 3 generators down represent [[9/8]] and 6 generators down represent [[5/4]]. Hence dual-3 sixix tempers out [[81/80]] in the 2.9.5 subgroup, but only every third interval in the sixix generator chains represents a JI interval.
For example, "dual-3 sixix" is a 2.3⁻.9.5 temperament with an optimal [[generator]] around 335.8¢ (optimizing only the 2.9.5 portion of the subgroup). Two generators up make the flat fifth, and five generators down make the flat fourth. Hence 3 generators down represent [[9/8]] and 6 generators down represent [[5/4]]. Hence dual-3 sixix tempers out [[81/80]] in the 2.9.5 subgroup, but only every third interval in the sixix generator chains represents a JI interval.


Alternatively, dual-fifth temperaments can be analyzed in a more conventional way as [[subgroup temperament]]s, where one of the fifths is mapped to [[3/2]] and the other is mapped to a nearby [[wolf interval|wolf fifth]] (such as [[64/43]], which is convenient since 2.3.43 is the same subgroup as 2.3.64/43).
Alternatively, dual-fifth temperaments can be analyzed in a more conventional way as [[subgroup temperament]]s, where one of the fifths is mapped to [[3/2]] and the other is mapped to a nearby [[wolf interval|wolf fifth]] (such as [[64/43]], which is convenient since 2.3.43 is the same subgroup as 2.3.64/43).  
 
== Dual-3 Spell ==
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5
 
[[Comma|Comma basis]]: [[25/24|{{monzo| -3 0 -1 2 }}]], [[81/80|{{monzo| -4 2 2 -1 }}]]
 
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 2 }}, {{val| 0 -3 4 2 }}]
 
2.9.5 [[POTE]] generator: ~(3⁻×3⁺)/8 = 192.4773
 
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 6, 13, 19 }}


== Dual-3 A-Team ==
== Dual-3 A-Team ==
Line 49: Line 38:


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 18, 28 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 18, 28 }}
=== 7-limit ===
Subgroup: 2.3⁻.3⁺.5.7
Comma basis: [[25/24|{{monzo| -3 1 -2 2 0 }}]], [[49/48|{{monzo| -4 1 -2 0 2 }}]], [[64/63|{{monzo| 6 -1 -1 0 -1 }}]]
Mapping: [{{val| 2 8 2 1 2 }}, {{val| 0 -4 1 3 3 }}]
2.9.5.7 POTE generator: ~3⁺/2 = 728.6349
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 18, 28 }}


== Megapyth ==
== Megapyth ==
Line 72: Line 72:
Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 0 -4 6 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 3 0 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 1 -2 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 1 0 0 -4 6 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 3 0 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 1 -2 }}]


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|30c, 47b, 52b}}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 30c, 47b, 52b }}


== Travesty ==
== Travesty ==