User:BudjarnLambeth/Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m got rid of the "this is the only extension in THAT subgroup" loopḧole
Line 134: Line 134:
* is particularly simple compared to other extensions to the same subgroup, or
* is particularly simple compared to other extensions to the same subgroup, or
* splits the base temperament's [[generator]]s in a nontrivial way and is better than other extensions to do the same by either of the above criteria.
* splits the base temperament's [[generator]]s in a nontrivial way and is better than other extensions to do the same by either of the above criteria.
If the extension is to a subgroup that does not fill out a prime limit in order, it should be explained why it is natural or reasonable to consider this (most commonly, that the temperament reaches the elements of this subgroup with either low complexity or minimal damage to accuracy compared to other primes).


Otherwise, only include temperaments which have low [[badness]] in a non-absurd, non-arbitrary [[subgroup]], or are restrictions of such to lower prime limits. It is of course also a requirement to include all the standard temperament data - subgroup, [[comma]]s, [[mapping]], and at least one [[optimal tuning]] - and a strong recommendation that at least one sentence of rationale (for why this temperament was documented or why this particular extension may be chosen) be provided as well.
Otherwise, only include temperaments which have low [[badness]] in a non-absurd, non-arbitrary [[subgroup]], or are restrictions of such to lower prime limits. It is of course also a requirement to include all the standard temperament data - subgroup, [[comma]]s, [[mapping]], and at least one [[optimal tuning]] - and a strong recommendation that at least one sentence of rationale (for why this temperament was documented or why this particular extension may be chosen) be provided as well.