Talk:General theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Are these things really "core concepts"?: new section |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC) | -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC) | ||
: No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea. | |||
: Regardless, here's my proposal: | |||
* [[Just intonation]] | |||
** [[Harmonic series]] | |||
** [[Harmonic limit]] | |||
** [[Odd limit]] | |||
* [[Scales]] | |||
** [[Equal division of the octave]] | |||
** [[MOS scale]] | |||
** [[Periods and generators]] | |||
* [[Temperaments]] | |||
** [[Equal temperament]] | |||
** [[Well temperament]] | |||
** [[Regular temperament]] | |||
: Other things to consider: JI: [[just intonation subgroup]], scales: [[step pattern]], maybe [[combination product set]] instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it. | |||
: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:52, 23 April 2025
![]() |
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
![]() |
This article is easily accessed and is intended to serve as a portal to the pedagogical enrichment of newcomers to the xenharmonic community as well as of more established members who are unaware of certain bodies of knowledge. As a result, it has been semi-protected to prevent vandalism.
Please be mindful of this when making edits to the article, or to the articles linked herefrom. |
Are these things really "core concepts"?
- Hexany
- Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic
- Equal division of the tritave
- Chord of nature
-- VectorGraphics (talk) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea.
- Regardless, here's my proposal:
- Other things to consider: JI: just intonation subgroup, scales: step pattern, maybe combination product set instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it.
- – Sintel🎏 (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)