Talk:Diesis (scale theory): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Re |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:: [[Diesis]], [[Diesis (interval region)]], [[Diesis (scale theory)]], [[Comma and diesis]] | :: [[Diesis]], [[Diesis (interval region)]], [[Diesis (scale theory)]], [[Comma and diesis]] | ||
:: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC) | :: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC) | ||
::: ''Enharmonic diesis'' should redirect here. The term is parallel to ''diatonic semitone'' and ''chromatic semitone''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:48, 21 April 2025
Merge with diesis
Diesis is already a disambiguation page, so I'd prefer just having one.
– Sintel🎏 (talk) 10:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't get what you mean. You sound to me like saying it being a disambiguation page implies it should not be a disambiguation page, but that is absurd. Perhaps you mean you want this paged merged with Diesis (interval region)? FloraC (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, I don't know what I want. I mostly was upset enharmonic diesis redirected here. There's just too many diesis pages now...
- Diesis, Diesis (interval region), Diesis (scale theory), Comma and diesis
- – Sintel🎏 (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)