User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Line 181: Line 181:
The name could do a better job of making it clearer than this is not the original mavila tuning. "Avila temperament" does a good enough job of this to get a good star rating, but something that more overtly states that it's not real mavila, like "mavilesque temperament" or "almovila temperament" would push it up to 5 stars.
The name could do a better job of making it clearer than this is not the original mavila tuning. "Avila temperament" does a good enough job of this to get a good star rating, but something that more overtly states that it's not real mavila, like "mavilesque temperament" or "almovila temperament" would push it up to 5 stars.


==== Kartvelian ====
==== Kartvelian^ ====
The inventor of the [[Kartvelian scale]] wrote a lot of dodgy stuff, claiming that his tuning was the exact same one that is actually used in [[Georgian|Georgia]], erasing all the nuances of how Georgian music is actually tuned. If I was rating based on all that, this entry would get 1 star.
The inventor of the [[Kartvelian scale]] wrote a lot of dodgy stuff, claiming that his tuning was the exact same one that is actually used in [[Georgian|Georgia]], erasing all the nuances of how Georgian music is actually tuned. If I was rating based on all that, this entry would get 1 star.


Line 187: Line 187:


So, everything else the inventor said about the Kartvelian scale, one star. But the name itself? Four stars! It’s great!
So, everything else the inventor said about the Kartvelian scale, one star. But the name itself? Four stars! It’s great!
==== ^The name is 4 stars, other stuff written about it is 1 star ====


==== Migration ====
==== Migration ====