Generator sequence: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Certain [[generator-offset property|generator-offset]] scales are examples. For example, [[diasem]] is AGS(8/7, 7/6) or AGS(7/6, 8/7) depending on [[chirality]]. The trivial case AGS(''x'') is stacking a single generator ''x'' to make a rank-2 scale, such as a [[MOS scale]]. | Certain [[generator-offset property|generator-offset]] scales are examples. For example, [[diasem]] is AGS(8/7, 7/6) or AGS(7/6, 8/7) depending on [[chirality]]. The trivial case AGS(''x'') is stacking a single generator ''x'' to make a rank-2 scale, such as a [[MOS scale]]. | ||
== Terminology == | == Terminology == | ||
* Consider a scale whose steps are all positive. Suppose that there exists ''k'' such that for every generator ''x''<sub>''i''</sub> in the AGS recipe AGS(''x''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''x''<sub>''r''</sub>), every occurrence of ''x''<sub>''i''</sub> in the scale [[subtend]]s ''k'' steps. | * Consider a scale whose steps are all positive. Suppose that there exists a positive integer ''k'' such that for every generator ''x''<sub>''i''</sub> in the AGS recipe AGS(''x''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''x''<sub>''r''</sub>), every occurrence of ''x''<sub>''i''</sub> in the scale [[subtend]]s ''k'' steps. | ||
* This automatically implies that the gap between the next higher equave and the result of stacking len(scale) − 1 of the generators in the recipe, called the ''imperfect generator'' since it is analogous to the imperfect generator in [[MOS]] scales, also subtends this number of steps. Suppose also that the imperfect generator is distinct from all of the generators used in the generator sequence. | * This automatically implies that the gap between the next higher equave and the result of stacking len(scale) − 1 of the generators in the recipe, called the ''imperfect generator'' since it is analogous to the imperfect generator in [[MOS]] scales, also subtends this number of steps. Suppose also that the imperfect generator is distinct from all of the generators used in the generator sequence. | ||
When all of the above hold, this article calls the resulting scale ''well-formed GS'' (WFGS){{idiosyncratic}}. In such a situation, we call the (logarithmic) average of the generators the ''guide generator''. The choice of "well-formed" is informed by the well-formed property of single-period MOS scales: the property that each occurrence of the generator subtends the same number of steps. The reason that WFGSes are studied is that the sequence yields CS scales at sizes of MOS scales generated by the guide generator and with the same period used by the WFGS, as long as the MOS scale in question is not too large. In summary, WFGS scales are made by detempering a MOS's generator chain into a stacked generator sequence, and the MOS sizes of the guide generator can help predict the sizes at which the GS scale will be CS. | When all of the above hold, this article calls the resulting scale ''well-formed GS'' (WFGS){{idiosyncratic}}. In such a situation, we call the (logarithmic) average of the generators the ''guide generator''. The choice of "well-formed" is informed by the well-formed property of single-period MOS scales: the property that each occurrence of the generator subtends the same number of steps. The reason that WFGSes are studied is that the sequence yields CS scales at sizes of MOS scales generated by the guide generator and with the same period used by the WFGS, as long as the MOS scale in question is not too large. In summary, WFGS scales are made by detempering a MOS's generator chain into a stacked generator sequence, and the MOS sizes of the guide generator can help predict the sizes at which the GS scale will be CS. | ||