Varunismic temperaments: Difference between revisions

Xenllium (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 28: Line 28:
[[POTE generator]]: ~243/196 = 372.597
[[POTE generator]]: ~243/196 = 372.597


{{Val list|legend=1| 58, 132d, 190, 248, 438d, 686d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 132d, 190, 248, 438d, 686d }}


[[Badness]]: 0.173565
[[Badness]]: 0.173565
Line 41: Line 41:
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 }}]


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}


Badness: 0.046447
Badness: 0.046447
Line 54: Line 54:
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 31 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 -38 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 2 10 27 23 33 31 }}, {{val| 0 -11 -36 -28 -42 -38 }}]


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 132de, 190, 248, 438d }}


Badness: 0.026107
Badness: 0.026107
Line 69: Line 69:
[[POTE generator]]: ~350/243 = 633.738
[[POTE generator]]: ~350/243 = 633.738


{{Val list|legend=1| 32c, 72, 176, 248, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 32c, 72, 176, 248, 320 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.102295
[[Badness]]: 0.102295
Line 82: Line 82:
POTE generator: ~121/84 = 633.755
POTE generator: ~121/84 = 633.755


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 32c, 72, 176, 248, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 32c, 72, 176, 248, 320 }}


Badness: 0.030159
Badness: 0.030159
Line 95: Line 95:
POTE generator: ~75/52 = 633.742
POTE generator: ~75/52 = 633.742


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 72, 176f, 248, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 72, 176f, 248, 320 }}


Badness: 0.027632
Badness: 0.027632
Line 108: Line 108:
POTE generator: ~13/9 = 633.8370
POTE generator: ~13/9 = 633.8370


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 32cf, 72, 176, 248f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 32cf, 72, 176, 248f }}


Badness: 0.030192
Badness: 0.030192