Talk:Sane and insane temperaments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→No-twos temperaments: +1 :) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: I would like to agree with that: Welcome, Moremajorthanmajor, to the discussion pages! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC) | :: I would like to agree with that: Welcome, Moremajorthanmajor, to the discussion pages! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Relevance == | |||
How often do these come up in practice? "Insane" temperaments seem be to no more than some theoretical pathological case. | |||
As it turns out this is equivalent to the comma basis having torsion, so at best this article can be a sidenote in the relevant article on torsion or saturation. It certainly doesn't need to be included here: [[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Mathematical_Theory]] | |||
Revision as of 21:53, 18 December 2021
No-twos temperaments
Can a no-twos temperament be sane?--Moremajorthanmajor (talk) 00:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sure. For example, all 12edo intervals can be interpreted in 3.5. Btw, glad you start to use talk pages. FloraC (talk) 14:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Relevance
How often do these come up in practice? "Insane" temperaments seem be to no more than some theoretical pathological case.
As it turns out this is equivalent to the comma basis having torsion, so at best this article can be a sidenote in the relevant article on torsion or saturation. It certainly doesn't need to be included here: [[1]]