OD: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Categories
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
fix section capitalization
Line 21: Line 21:
== Relationship to other tunings ==
== Relationship to other tunings ==


=== vs. ED ===
=== Vs. ED ===


It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch, or 12-EDO — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-UDO.
It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch, or 12-EDO — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-UDO.


=== vs. EFD ===
=== Vs. EFD ===


The only difference between n-ODp and n-EFDp is that the p for an [[EFD|EFD (equal frequency division)]] is irrational, and therefore its pitches and intervals are all irrational too.  
The only difference between n-ODp and n-EFDp is that the p for an [[EFD|EFD (equal frequency division)]] is irrational, and therefore its pitches and intervals are all irrational too.  


=== vs. ADO ===
=== Vs. ADO ===


The nth [[Overtone scale|overtone mode, or over-n scale]] is equivalent to n-ODO. So is n-[[ADO]].  
The nth [[Overtone scale|overtone mode, or over-n scale]] is equivalent to n-ODO. So is n-[[ADO]].  


=== vs. OS ===
=== Vs. OS ===


Any ODO will be equivalent to some [[OS|OS (otonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4.
Any ODO will be equivalent to some [[OS|OS (otonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4.


=== vs. UD ===
=== Vs. UD ===


The equivalent utonal version of an OD is a [[UD|UD (utonal sequence)]].  
The equivalent utonal version of an OD is a [[UD|UD (utonal sequence)]].  

Revision as of 19:38, 11 November 2021

An OD, or otonal division, is a kind of arithmetic and harmonotonic tuning.

Specification

Its full specification is n-ODp: n otonal divisions of the rational interval p.

Formula

To find the steps for an n-ODp, begin by recognizing that while the multiplicative interval relating your root position to the end position is [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] (or [math]\displaystyle{ \frac p1 }[/math]), if you are going to move arithmetically (by repeated addition) from [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math], then the difference in frequency space that you are dividing up is not actually [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math], but [math]\displaystyle{ p - 1 }[/math]. And because you are dividing it into [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] parts, each step will have a size of [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{p-1}{n} }[/math]. So, the formula for the frequency of step [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] of an n-ODp is:

[math]\displaystyle{ f(k) = 1 + (\frac kn)(p-1) }[/math]

This way, when [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ 0 }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ f(k) }[/math] is simply [math]\displaystyle{ 1 }[/math]. And when [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ f(k) }[/math] is simply [math]\displaystyle{ 1 + (p-1) = p }[/math].

Tips

If you want to describe overtones 1-9 as an OD you would need to use 8-OD9, because there are only 8 steps from 1 to 9. You could think of it like 9 is the 8th overtone, so you're really dividing 8 by 8. You're dividing the number of overtones. Alternatively, you could describe this as an OS, or overtone sequence, by simply saying 8-OS.

Relationship to other tunings

Vs. ED

It is possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch, or 12-EDO — divide it into 12 equal parts by length. You will have 12-UDO.

Vs. EFD

The only difference between n-ODp and n-EFDp is that the p for an EFD (equal frequency division) is irrational, and therefore its pitches and intervals are all irrational too.

Vs. ADO

The nth overtone mode, or over-n scale is equivalent to n-ODO. So is n-ADO.

Vs. OS

Any ODO will be equivalent to some OS (otonal sequence). E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4.

Vs. UD

The equivalent utonal version of an OD is a UD (utonal sequence).

Examples

example: 4-ODO
quantity (0) 1 2 3 4
frequency (f) (4/4) 5/4 6/4 7/4 8/4
pitch (log₂f) (0) 0.32 0.58 0.81 1
length (1/f) (4/4) 4/5 4/6 4/7 4/8