Talk:Schismatic family: Difference between revisions
FilterNashi (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC) | ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. At first, I put it as 2.3.5.13 because it's much better there (so much so that Pythagorean tuning is a possible tuning for this temp) than at 2.3.5.11(.13). --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 18:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC) | |||