Regular temperament: Difference between revisions

Line 46:

The [[rank]] of a temperament is its dimension. It equals the number of generators in the [[Just intonation subgroup|subgroup]] being used minus the number of independent commas that are tempered out.

Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of [[optimization]], which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are [[POTE tuning|POTE]] ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), [[TOP tuning|TOP]] ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently [[~~CTE~~]] ("Constained ~~Tenney–Euclidean~~"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a [[optimal ET sequence|sequence of equal temperaments]] showing possible [[equal-step tuning]]s in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI.

Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of [[optimization]], which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are [[POTE tuning|POTE]] ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), [[TOP tuning|TOP]] ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently [[CWE]] ("Constained Weil–Euclidean"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a [[optimal ET sequence|sequence of equal temperaments]] showing possible [[equal-step tuning]]s in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI.

The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are [[Graham Breed]]'s [http://x31eq.com/temper/ Temperament Finder] and [[~~User:~~Sintel~~|sintel~~]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ Temperament Calculator]; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements ~~CTE~~ and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to [[warts]] that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups.

The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are [[Graham Breed]]'s [http://x31eq.com/temper/ Temperament Finder] and [[Sintel]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ Temperament Calculator]; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements CWE and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to [[warts]] that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups.

Usually, temperaments have names coming from a wide array of [[temperament names|sources]], but they can also have systematic and rigorous names, from which the comma(s) can be deduced. The most common systematic temperament naming system on the wiki is [[color notation]]: {{nowrap|wa {{=}} 3-limit|yo {{=}} 5-over|gu {{=}} 5-under|zo {{=}} 7-over|and ru {{=}} 7-under}} (see also [[~~Color~~ notation/Temperament names]]).

Usually, temperaments have names coming from a wide array of [[temperament names|sources]], but they can also have systematic and rigorous names, from which the comma(s) can be deduced. The most common systematic temperament naming system on the wiki is [[Kite's color notation]]: {{nowrap|wa {{=}} 3-limit|yo {{=}} 5-over|gu {{=}} 5-under|zo {{=}} 7-over|and ru {{=}} 7-under}} (see also [[Kite's color notation/Temperament names]]).

Yet another recent development is the concept of a [[pergen]], appearing in our [[~~tour~~ of regular temperaments]] as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called [[ploidacot]].

Yet another recent development is the concept of a [[pergen]], appearing in our [[Tour of regular temperaments]] as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called [[ploidacot]].

== Further reading ==

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 The [[rank]] of a temperament is its dimension. It equals the number of generators in the [[Just intonation subgroup|subgroup]] being used minus the number of independent commas that are tempered out.
-Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of [[optimization]], which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are [[POTE tuning|POTE]] ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), [[TOP tuning|TOP]] ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently [[CTE]] ("Constained Tenney–Euclidean"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a [[optimal ET sequence|sequence of equal temperaments]] showing possible [[equal-step tuning]]s in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI.
+Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of [[optimization]], which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are [[POTE tuning|POTE]] ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), [[TOP tuning|TOP]] ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently [[CWE]] ("Constained Weil–Euclidean"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a [[optimal ET sequence|sequence of equal temperaments]] showing possible [[equal-step tuning]]s in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI.
-The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are [[Graham Breed]]'s [http://x31eq.com/temper/ Temperament Finder] and [[User:Sintel|sintel]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ Temperament Calculator]; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements CTE and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to [[warts]] that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups.
+The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are [[Graham Breed]]'s [http://x31eq.com/temper/ Temperament Finder] and [[Sintel]]'s [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/ Temperament Calculator]; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements CWE and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to [[warts]] that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups.
-Usually, temperaments have names coming from a wide array of [[temperament names|sources]], but they can also have systematic and rigorous names,  from which the comma(s) can be deduced. The most common systematic temperament naming system on the wiki is [[color notation]]: {{nowrap|wa {{=}} 3-limit|yo {{=}} 5-over|gu {{=}} 5-under|zo {{=}} 7-over|and ru {{=}} 7-under}} (see also [[Color notation/Temperament names]]).
+Usually, temperaments have names coming from a wide array of [[temperament names|sources]], but they can also have systematic and rigorous names, from which the comma(s) can be deduced. The most common systematic temperament naming system on the wiki is [[Kite's color notation]]: {{nowrap|wa {{=}} 3-limit|yo {{=}} 5-over|gu {{=}} 5-under|zo {{=}} 7-over|and ru {{=}} 7-under}} (see also [[Kite's color notation/Temperament names]]).
-Yet another recent development is the concept of a [[pergen]], appearing in our [[tour of regular temperaments]] as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called [[ploidacot]].
+Yet another recent development is the concept of a [[pergen]], appearing in our [[Tour of regular temperaments]] as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called [[ploidacot]].
 == Further reading ==