Re
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
Line 29: Line 29:


:: Was there anything you wanted to address by the addition of a Theory section, which I suppose was modeled after the edo pages? It will imply changes to many temperament articles if we make it to the layout guide so I'd like to be sure about it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:27, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
:: Was there anything you wanted to address by the addition of a Theory section, which I suppose was modeled after the edo pages? It will imply changes to many temperament articles if we make it to the layout guide so I'd like to be sure about it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:27, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
::: I think some other temperament pages have similar "theory" sections - e.g. [[Slendric]]. Originally in the case of Orwell it was a way to move the comma information out of the intro and into a place where it generally belongs on EDO pages. However I generally think such things are a good idea to have even if in many temperaments, the interval chain might be the only thing in that section. It invites others to discuss potentially practical and specific theory more. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 15:44, 15 September 2025 (UTC)