Talk:Rodan: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Re
Line 3: Line 3:


: 55/48 and 63/55 are in [[Mothra]] as well; 80/63 was the complex interval in the interval chain previously though it makes even less sense to keep that and not the 55-odds. The decision to make the cutoff at 11-limit vs 13-limit was somewhat of a close call; primarily 17-limit rodan doesn't really do much more damage on top of 13-limit either, so it feels weird for specifically 17-limit to get its own column but 13-limit to not. I don't think most of the ratios I kept are useless enough to be "noise", I think it's better to have complete odd limits in interval chains and it makes sense to consider at least 63-odd given the structure of slendric. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 13:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
: 55/48 and 63/55 are in [[Mothra]] as well; 80/63 was the complex interval in the interval chain previously though it makes even less sense to keep that and not the 55-odds. The decision to make the cutoff at 11-limit vs 13-limit was somewhat of a close call; primarily 17-limit rodan doesn't really do much more damage on top of 13-limit either, so it feels weird for specifically 17-limit to get its own column but 13-limit to not. I don't think most of the ratios I kept are useless enough to be "noise", I think it's better to have complete odd limits in interval chains and it makes sense to consider at least 63-odd given the structure of slendric. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 13:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
:: Then I think 55/48, 63/55 and the like should get out of ''Mothra'' too. 80/63 was on this page, yes. I added it years ago. Now I want to remove it. Those ratios are absolutely overshadowed by the clarity of much simpler ones like 8/7 or 14/11. Even ''structurally'', the comma steps should suffice for conceptualizing the temp and grabbing a feeling for it. To be realistic: 55/48 simply doesn't mean anything to anyone who hasn't memorized it's the difference between 5/4 and 12/11 or between 6/5 and 11/8, and there's very little reason to watch that difference cuz the two ratios have nothing in common in the first place. The difference between say 5/4 and 14/11 are more pertinent cuz the ratios sound similar enough to be put together and compared to each other.
:: 87edo has a practically pure prime 13 whereas the prime 17 is several cents sharp with 17/14 and 21/17 being particularly off, so I'm afraid I still don't get why you set the cut between 11- and 13-limit rather than between 13- and 17-limit.
:: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:35, 15 June 2025

13-limit & overcomplex ratios

Imo the 13-limit should be in the main column of the interval table. It's not less accurate than the 11-limit at all and practically no competing extensions exist there. The 17-limit on the other hand is less accurate, so I gave it an extra column. Also I believe those two- or three-digit ratios should not be there when much simpler ones exist (superparticular commas & their inverses such as 160/81 should be exempt). For the classes where the simplest ratio is complex it may be reasonable e.g. for 50/27 it may be good to have 81/44 and 90/49 for reference. But why would one think of 55/48 or 63/55 when it's clearly 8/7? Those numbers are just noises that dilute the actually important information. FloraC (talk) 10:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

55/48 and 63/55 are in Mothra as well; 80/63 was the complex interval in the interval chain previously though it makes even less sense to keep that and not the 55-odds. The decision to make the cutoff at 11-limit vs 13-limit was somewhat of a close call; primarily 17-limit rodan doesn't really do much more damage on top of 13-limit either, so it feels weird for specifically 17-limit to get its own column but 13-limit to not. I don't think most of the ratios I kept are useless enough to be "noise", I think it's better to have complete odd limits in interval chains and it makes sense to consider at least 63-odd given the structure of slendric. -- Lériendil (talk) 13:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Then I think 55/48, 63/55 and the like should get out of Mothra too. 80/63 was on this page, yes. I added it years ago. Now I want to remove it. Those ratios are absolutely overshadowed by the clarity of much simpler ones like 8/7 or 14/11. Even structurally, the comma steps should suffice for conceptualizing the temp and grabbing a feeling for it. To be realistic: 55/48 simply doesn't mean anything to anyone who hasn't memorized it's the difference between 5/4 and 12/11 or between 6/5 and 11/8, and there's very little reason to watch that difference cuz the two ratios have nothing in common in the first place. The difference between say 5/4 and 14/11 are more pertinent cuz the ratios sound similar enough to be put together and compared to each other.
87edo has a practically pure prime 13 whereas the prime 17 is several cents sharp with 17/14 and 21/17 being particularly off, so I'm afraid I still don't get why you set the cut between 11- and 13-limit rather than between 13- and 17-limit.
FloraC (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)