Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
Reply to compactstar |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
BTW for alpharabian & axirabian interval situation I agree with what Aura and Margo Schulter had stated. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 04:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | BTW for alpharabian & axirabian interval situation I agree with what Aura and Margo Schulter had stated. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 04:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
: With regards to the kangaroo example, I think the fact that it provides a theoretical framework for understanding 15edo in a way that similar temperaments don't '''''is''''' "a clear conceptual benefit" which 'solves a specific problem'. So in my opinion I would say that it is still notable under these guidelines. But I'll wait to see what Sintel says. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | : With regards to the kangaroo example, I think the fact that it provides a theoretical framework for understanding 15edo in a way that similar temperaments don't '''''is''''' "a clear conceptual benefit" which 'solves a specific problem'. So in my opinion I would say that it is still notable under these guidelines. | ||
: But I'll wait to see what Sintel says. | |||
: Though it is only notable if the page actually explicitly spells out its usefulness in plain text - if it is just numbers and the reader is left to guess why it's important, then it's not notable. And maybe needs a "niche" mbox though since while useful, it is only useful for quite a niche purpose. | |||
: But imo I think it'd still be notable under the current guidelines. | |||
: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | |||