Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions
→Alpharabian interval pages: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
While this sums up most of what's going on with those pages at present, I do eventually intend to expand those Alpharabian interval articles with later findings on how to properly use them in musical composition- the only problem is that I haven't gotten around to figuring out how to use some of those intervals yet, as I currently have other things on my plate, but believe me, they're on my radar. Perhaps Margo can elaborate on what she knows about those intervals on her end. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | While this sums up most of what's going on with those pages at present, I do eventually intend to expand those Alpharabian interval articles with later findings on how to properly use them in musical composition- the only problem is that I haven't gotten around to figuring out how to use some of those intervals yet, as I currently have other things on my plate, but believe me, they're on my radar. Perhaps Margo can elaborate on what she knows about those intervals on her end. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
I guess the gist of all this is that now that we know why pages such as the Alpharabian interval pages are useful to readers, I think it suffices to say that I do approve of the majority of these notability guidelines. I do think however, that we can include a few examples of what's notable and why in the guidelines themselves, so that people can spot more of the things that make pages notable, especially those that are notable in spite of other, potentially disqualifying factors. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC) | |||