Talk:General theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m link |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
** [[Harmonic limit]] | ** [[Harmonic limit]] | ||
** [[Odd limit]] | ** [[Odd limit]] | ||
* [[Scales]] | * [[Scale|Scales]] | ||
** [[Equal division of the octave]] | ** [[Equal division of the octave]] | ||
** [[MOS scale]] | ** [[MOS scale]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 23 April 2025
| This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
| This article is easily accessed and is intended to serve as a portal to the pedagogical enrichment of newcomers to the xenharmonic community as well as of more established members who are unaware of certain bodies of knowledge. As a result, it has been semi-protected to prevent vandalism.
Please be mindful of this when making edits to the article, or to the articles linked herefrom. |
Are these things really "core concepts"?
- Hexany
- Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic
- Equal division of the tritave
- Chord of nature
-- VectorGraphics (talk) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea.
- Regardless, here's my proposal:
- Other things to consider: JI: just intonation subgroup, scales: step pattern, maybe combination product set instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it.
- – Sintel🎏 (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)