FloraC

For (especially) the first last, I now understand from your edit comment that non-Septimal-Meantone 7-limit and all 11-limit entries should go somewhere else.  I did see the tuning table for Flattone, so maybe the entries close to 7EDO should go there?  And maybe the Flattone EDOs currently in this table should also be moved there?  But then flatter-than-flattone (Flattertone) doesn't have its own tuning spectrum table, and given that it is a sub-entry of the Meantone family article, I thought a new table would look kind of funny there.  Similarly, Dominant doesn't have its own tuning spectrum table, and given that it is a sub-entry of the Meantone family article, I thought a new table would look kind of funny there.  Not sure yet whether all negative Meantones like 17c should all go in a hypothetical Dominant tuning spectrum table, although 17c itself is Dominant.  I DID see (although I must confess temporarily forgot about) the multiple tuning tables in Meantone vs Meanpop, so maybe the Ptolemismic tuning (11-limit) should go there?  Although I'm not sure which of the tables it would fit into.  Of these tables, only Tridecimal Meantone and Meanpop (but not Tridecimal Meanpop) have a negative meantone entry at all, and those are all only very slightly sharpened.  Although at least if a new tuning spectrum table was needed in there, it wouldn't seem out of place.  On the other hand, maybe such a hypothetical table should be somewhere else entirely, since undecimal negative Meantone (probably -- haven't done the math yet) would be neither Undecimal Meantone nor Meanpop?

[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)