User:BudjarnLambeth/Generalising equal divisions of the octave: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Marked as editable user page
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I have found myself confused trying to wrap my head around AFDOs, IFDOs, and all the similar acronyms. This is my attempt to summarise what I have understood from what I have read on the wiki. Especially what I have read in the articles [[harmonotonic tuning]], [[arithmetic tuning]], [[equal-step tuning]], [[AFDO]] and [[IFDO]].
{{Editable user page}}
 
= Author note =
I have found myself confused trying to wrap my head around IFDOs, arithmetic tunings, harmonotonic tunings and other related concepts. This is my attempt to summarise what I have understood from what I have read on the wiki. Especially what I have read in the articles [[harmonotonic tuning]], [[arithmetic tuning]], [[equal-step tuning]], [[AFDO]] and [[IFDO]].


Either here or in the discussion section, please correct any errors I have made. Please also mention any more types of equal-ish tuning that I haven’t yet mentioned here but really should be mentioned.
Either here or in the discussion section, please correct any errors I have made. Please also mention any more types of equal-ish tuning that I haven’t yet mentioned here but really should be mentioned.
Line 7: Line 10:
I think that I am an ideal person to do this, because I ''am'' a beginner, so if I can write a page that even ''I'' can understand, then I think anyone will be able to understand it.
I think that I am an ideal person to do this, because I ''am'' a beginner, so if I can write a page that even ''I'' can understand, then I think anyone will be able to understand it.


= The page itself =


== EDO (equal divisions of the octave) ==
== EDO (equal divisions of the octave) ==