User:TromboneBoi9: Difference between revisions
TromboneBoi9 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
TromboneBoi9 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 313: | Line 313: | ||
Since the third harmonic is an even number of steps in 19 (30 steps), splitting evenly into two harmonic (subminor) sevenths. If you take a major pentatonic scale, put a harmonic seventh in between each fifth, and reduce the whole scale into an octave, you get a nine-tone scale somewhat similar to the [[wikipedia:Double_harmonic_scale|double harmonic scale]] in 12. | Since the third harmonic is an even number of steps in 19 (30 steps), splitting evenly into two harmonic (subminor) sevenths. If you take a major pentatonic scale, put a harmonic seventh in between each fifth, and reduce the whole scale into an octave, you get a nine-tone scale somewhat similar to the [[wikipedia:Double_harmonic_scale|double harmonic scale]] in 12. | ||
My thought was, if you use pure 3-limit Just Intonation, you can split the third harmonic into two "ratios" of √3. What would that sound like? | My thought was, if you use pure 3-limit Just Intonation, you can split the third harmonic into two "ratios" of √3, measuring around 950.978 cents. What would that sound like? | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
!Degree | !Degree | ||
!Ratio | !Ratio | ||
!Decimal | |||
!Cents | !Cents | ||
|- | |- | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
|1/1 | |1/1 | ||
|1.0000 | |||
|0.000 | |0.000 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
|9/8 | |9/8 | ||
|1.1250 | |||
|203.910 | |203.910 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
|81/64 | |81/64 | ||
|1.2656 | |||
|407.820 | |407.820 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
|3√3/4 | |3√3/4 | ||
|1.2990 | |||
|452.933 | |452.933 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
|27√3/32 | |27√3/32 | ||
|1.4614 | |||
|656.843 | |656.843 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|6 | |6 | ||
|3/2 | |3/2 | ||
|1.5000 | |||
|701.955 | |701.955 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7 | |7 | ||
|27/16 | |27/16 | ||
|1.6875 | |||
|905.865 | |905.865 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |8 | ||
|√3/1 | |√3/1 | ||
|1.7321 | |||
|950.978 | |950.978 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9 | |9 | ||
|9√3/8 | |9√3/8 | ||
|1.9486 | |||
|1154.888 | |1154.888 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10 | |10 | ||
|2/1 | |2/1 | ||
|2.0000 | |||
|1200.000 | |||
|} | |||
But of course Saga wasn't looking for a √3 interval, he meant to use the [[7/4|harmonic (subminor) seventh]]. The two intervals are rather close though: the seventh is about 17.848 cents sharper. | |||
Using harmonic sevenths of 968.826 cents: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!Degree | |||
!Ratio | |||
!Decimal | |||
!Cents | |||
|- | |||
|1 | |||
|1/1 | |||
|1.0000 | |||
|0.000 | |||
|- | |||
|2 | |||
|9/8 | |||
|1.1250 | |||
|203.910 | |||
|- | |||
|3 | |||
|81/64 | |||
|1.2656 | |||
|407.820 | |||
|- | |||
|4 | |||
|21/16 | |||
|1.3125 | |||
|470.781 | |||
|- | |||
|5 | |||
|189/128 | |||
|1.4766 | |||
|674.691 | |||
|- | |||
|6 | |||
|3/2 | |||
|1.5000 | |||
|701.955 | |||
|- | |||
|7 | |||
|27/16 | |||
|1.6875 | |||
|905.865 | |||
|- | |||
|8 | |||
|7/4 | |||
|1.7500 | |||
|968.826 | |||
|- | |||
|9 | |||
|63/32 | |||
|1.9486 | |||
|1172.736 | |||
|- | |||
|10 | |||
|2/1 | |||
|2.0000 | |||
|1200.000 | |||
|} | |||
Using harmonic sevenths inverted around the third harmonic, or just [[12/7|supermajor sixths (12/7)]], of 933.129 cents: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!Degree | |||
!Ratio | |||
!Decimal | |||
!Cents | |||
|- | |||
|1 | |||
|1/1 | |||
|1.0000 | |||
|0.000 | |||
|- | |||
|2 | |||
|9/8 | |||
|1.1250 | |||
|203.910 | |||
|- | |||
|3 | |||
|81/64 | |||
|1.2656 | |||
|407.820 | |||
|- | |||
|4 | |||
|9/7 | |||
|1.2857 | |||
|435.084 | |||
|- | |||
|5 | |||
|81/56 | |||
|1.4464 | |||
|638.9941 | |||
|- | |||
|6 | |||
|3/2 | |||
|1.5000 | |||
|701.955 | |||
|- | |||
|7 | |||
|27/16 | |||
|1.6875 | |||
|905.865 | |||
|- | |||
|8 | |||
|12/7 | |||
|1.7143 | |||
|933.129 | |||
|- | |||
|9 | |||
|27/14 | |||
|1.9286 | |||
|1137.039 | |||
|- | |||
|10 | |||
|2/1 | |||
|2.0000 | |||
|1200.000 | |1200.000 | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 05:35, 27 November 2023
Hello! My name is Andrew and I like screwing around with xenharmony, especially notation.
Check it out, I have a website! Here she is!
I also exist on the XA Discord, currently under the alias Sir Semiflat.
At some point I plan to make a piece similar to Easley Blackwood's 12 Etudes or Aaron Andrew Hunt's Equal-Tempered Keyboard, an "album" experimenting with a range of different EDO systems.
Keep in mind that I have constantly been making changes to this page, so I could have made a lot of mistakes here.
An idea for notation I had
Something I noticed in regular EDO notation, relying on Pythagorean names with an extra layer of accidentals, is that the Pythagorean major third in a lot of EDO systems doesn't match the just major third 5/4. So, with some thought from Just Intonation notations, I came up with something that I think might be promising.
In essence, instead of solely relying on Pythagorean names and arrows for edosteps in between (which can get unwieldy in larger EDOs, e.g. 72-EDO), I considered giving the syntonic comma a single symbol instead. That way you can emphasize the 5-limit in your compositions more easily, and it will stay that way when directly read in a different EDO.
If your EDO has a different pitch for the just major third and the Pythagorean major third, then of course, it has a syntonic comma that hasn't been tempered out. This won't change much notation-wise for EDOs with a syntonic comma of 0 or 1 step, of course, but it could have an effect on even "sharper" systems like 37-EDO with a larger comma.
The syntonic comma can be represented by slashes: / and \. Single edosteps are still notated with arrows: ^ and v.
Here's a full example in 37-EDO:
Steps | Pythagorean notation | Old notation | New notation |
---|---|---|---|
0 | D | D | D |
1 | Eb | Eb | Eb |
2 | Fb | ^Eb | /D |
3 | Gbb | ^^Eb | /Eb |
4 | Bx | vvD# | \D# |
5 | Cx | vD# | \E |
6 | D# | D# | D# |
7 | E | E | E |
8 | F | F | F |
9 | Gb | Gb | Gb |
10 | Abb | ^Gb | /F |
11 | Bbbb | ^^Gb | /Gb |
12 | Dx | vvF# | \F# |
13 | E# | vF# | \G |
14 | F# | F# | F# |
15 | G | G | G |
16 | Ab | Ab | Ab |
17 | Bbb | ^Ab | /G |
18 | Cbb | ^^Ab | /Ab |
19 | Ex | vvG# | \G# |
20 | Fx | vG# | \A |
21 | G# | G# | G# |
22 | A | A | A |
23 | Bb | Bb | Bb |
24 | Cb | ^Bb | /A |
25 | Dbb | ^^Bb | \Bb |
26 | F#x | vvA# | \A# |
27 | Gx | vA# | \B |
28 | A# | A# | A# |
29 | B | B | B |
30 | C | C | C |
31 | Db | Db | Db |
32 | Ebb | ^Db | /C |
33 | Fbb | ^^Db | /Db |
34 | Ax | vvC# | \C# |
35 | B# | vC# | \D |
36 | C# | C# | C# |
37 | D | D | D |
For systems with a negative syntonic comma (most often in sub-meantone systems), use ) and ( instead of / and \.
Use harmonic notation for anti-diatonic systems.
An example in 13-EDO:
Steps | Pythagorean/old notation | 26-EDO Subset | New notation |
---|---|---|---|
0 | D | D | D |
1 | E | Dx, Ebb | E, )C |
2 | Eb | E | Eb, )D |
3 | Fx | Ex, Fb | )E, (F |
4 | F# | F# | F#, (G |
5 | F | Gb | F, (A |
6 | G | G# | G, (B |
7 | A | Ab | A, )F |
8 | B | A# | B, )G |
9 | Bb | Bb | Bb, )A |
10 | Cx | B# | )B, (C |
11 | C# | C | C#, (D |
12 | C | Cx, Dbb | C, (E |
13 | D | D | D |
For systems with describable quarter tones, you can optionally use quarter tone notation. Though for many systems (24, 31), the syntonic comma notation makes it redundant; perhaps it could be of use in larger systems like 41, 48, or 72.
Scales n' Stuff
Website
I have some scales ready in Scala format on my website here.
Blues scale in 10-EDO
I kinda like the 3 1 1 1 2 2 scale in 10-EDO, it works alright as a Blues scale. I think the second degree (3\10) is a bit sharper than it should, in fact a lot of intervals are "stretched out" in comparison to the Blues scale in 12, but before I didn't have very many scales in 10 under my belt except for the equipentatonic scale.
I dunno, I stick to theory more often than I should; I use theoretical diatonic intervals/scales more often than intervals/scales that actually sound diatonic. Luckily I've been experimenting with 14-EDO recently, and I think it's good territory to fix that.
Enneatonic scale in "3-limit"
Supahstar Saga described a scale in 19-EDO in his Exploring 19-TET YouTube series called the Enneatonic scale:
Since the third harmonic is an even number of steps in 19 (30 steps), splitting evenly into two harmonic (subminor) sevenths. If you take a major pentatonic scale, put a harmonic seventh in between each fifth, and reduce the whole scale into an octave, you get a nine-tone scale somewhat similar to the double harmonic scale in 12.
My thought was, if you use pure 3-limit Just Intonation, you can split the third harmonic into two "ratios" of √3, measuring around 950.978 cents. What would that sound like?
Degree | Ratio | Decimal | Cents |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1/1 | 1.0000 | 0.000 |
2 | 9/8 | 1.1250 | 203.910 |
3 | 81/64 | 1.2656 | 407.820 |
4 | 3√3/4 | 1.2990 | 452.933 |
5 | 27√3/32 | 1.4614 | 656.843 |
6 | 3/2 | 1.5000 | 701.955 |
7 | 27/16 | 1.6875 | 905.865 |
8 | √3/1 | 1.7321 | 950.978 |
9 | 9√3/8 | 1.9486 | 1154.888 |
10 | 2/1 | 2.0000 | 1200.000 |
But of course Saga wasn't looking for a √3 interval, he meant to use the harmonic (subminor) seventh. The two intervals are rather close though: the seventh is about 17.848 cents sharper.
Using harmonic sevenths of 968.826 cents:
Degree | Ratio | Decimal | Cents |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1/1 | 1.0000 | 0.000 |
2 | 9/8 | 1.1250 | 203.910 |
3 | 81/64 | 1.2656 | 407.820 |
4 | 21/16 | 1.3125 | 470.781 |
5 | 189/128 | 1.4766 | 674.691 |
6 | 3/2 | 1.5000 | 701.955 |
7 | 27/16 | 1.6875 | 905.865 |
8 | 7/4 | 1.7500 | 968.826 |
9 | 63/32 | 1.9486 | 1172.736 |
10 | 2/1 | 2.0000 | 1200.000 |
Using harmonic sevenths inverted around the third harmonic, or just supermajor sixths (12/7), of 933.129 cents:
Degree | Ratio | Decimal | Cents |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1/1 | 1.0000 | 0.000 |
2 | 9/8 | 1.1250 | 203.910 |
3 | 81/64 | 1.2656 | 407.820 |
4 | 9/7 | 1.2857 | 435.084 |
5 | 81/56 | 1.4464 | 638.9941 |
6 | 3/2 | 1.5000 | 701.955 |
7 | 27/16 | 1.6875 | 905.865 |
8 | 12/7 | 1.7143 | 933.129 |
9 | 27/14 | 1.9286 | 1137.039 |
10 | 2/1 | 2.0000 | 1200.000 |
Irrational HEJI Extensions
I've heard phi is somewhat useful in xen areas, as well as other popular irrational numbers, so what would it look like if I extended HEJI (my go-to Just Intonation notation) to support these numbers like factors?
Commas
Golden Ratio
The ratio phi adds up to 833.0903 cents, a sharp minor sixth. The Pythagorean minor sixth is 128/81, about 792.1800 cents. This leaves a comma of 81ϕ/128, about 40.9103 cents. I dub this interval the Golden quartertone.
Pi
The ratio π/2 adds up to 781.7954 cents, an okay minor sixth. The Pythagorean minor sixth is 128/81, about 792.1800 cents. This leaves a comma of 256/81π, about 10.3846 cents. I dub this interval the Circular comma.
Euler's constant
The ratio e/2 adds up to 531.2340 cents, a pretty sharp fourth. The Pythagorean perfect fourth is, of course, 4/3, 498.0450 cents. This leaves a comma of 3e/8, about 33.1890 cents. I dub this interval the Eulerian comma.
Notation
For the golden quartertone, I plan to use the symbol Blackwood used in his microtonal notation, because it already resembles a phi symbol (ϕ). For pi, I designed a symbol similar to the 55-comma symbol in Sagittal, but the "arrowhead" is replaced with a circular cap, making the symbol resemble a J with an extra shaft.
I'm yet to design a symbol for e.