Ed5/2: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


Incidentally, one way to treat 5/2 as an equivalence is the use of the 2:3:4:(5) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 3:4:5:(6) chord in meantone. Whereas in meantone it takes three 4/3 to get to 6/5, here it takes three 3/2 to get to 6/5 (tempering out the comma 3125/3048). So, doing this yields 5, 7, and 12 note MOS, just like meantone. While the notes are rather closer together, the scheme is exactly identical to meantone. "Macrodiatonic" might be a perfect term for it because it uses a scheme that turns out exactly identical to meantone, though severely stretched.
Incidentally, one way to treat 5/2 as an equivalence is the use of the 2:3:4:(5) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 3:4:5:(6) chord in meantone. Whereas in meantone it takes three 4/3 to get to 6/5, here it takes three 3/2 to get to 6/5 (tempering out the comma 3125/3048). So, doing this yields 5, 7, and 12 note MOS, just like meantone. While the notes are rather closer together, the scheme is exactly identical to meantone. "Macrodiatonic" might be a perfect term for it because it uses a scheme that turns out exactly identical to meantone, though severely stretched.
Alternatively, we can continue to use 4:5:6 as the fundamental complete sonority as in meantone. In this case, it takes three rather than four 3/2 to get to 5/1, tempering out the comma [[250/243]]. This produces [[MOS scales]] of the families 2L 3s<5/2>, 2L 5s<5/2>, 2L 7s<5/2> and 2L 9s<5/2>.


== Individual pages for ED5/2s ==
== Individual pages for ED5/2s ==