Xenharmonic Wiki

Countercomp family: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
→Hemicountercomp: +minimal generator tunings; +13-limit; consolidate names
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
5,160 edits
"o
Line 12: Line 12:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~531441/524288 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 386.668
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~531441/524288 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 386.668


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205, 369, 574, 779, 2132bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205, 369, 574, 779, 2132bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.934310
[[Badness]]: 0.934310
Line 27: Line 27:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~64/63 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.731
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~64/63 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.731


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205d, 246d, 451dd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123, 164, 205d, 246d, 451dd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.161056
[[Badness]]: 0.161056
Line 40: Line 40:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.871
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.871


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 123e, 164, 205d, 451dd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123e, 164, 205d, 451dd }}


Badness: 0.076537
Badness: 0.076537
Line 53: Line 53:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 386.604
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 386.604


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 123e, 164, 205d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123e, 164, 205d }}


Badness: 0.054921
Badness: 0.054921
Line 68: Line 68:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~50/49 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.667
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~50/49 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.667


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 123d, 164d, 205, 246, 451d, 697dd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 123d, 164d, 205, 246, 451d, 697dd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.142344
[[Badness]]: 0.142344
Line 81: Line 81:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~55/54 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.309
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~55/54 = 1\41, ~5/4 = 385.309


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 164d, 205, 246 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 164d, 205, 246 }}


Badness: 0.076588
Badness: 0.076588
Line 96: Line 96:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~100352/98415 = 1\41, ~567/512 = 178.5314 (~5120/5103 = 2.9216)
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~100352/98415 = 1\41, ~567/512 = 178.5314 (~5120/5103 = 2.9216)


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, …, 328, 369, 779, 1927bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, …, 328, 369, 779, 1927bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.134559
[[Badness]]: 0.134559
Line 109: Line 109:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~567/512 = 178.6944 (~3025/3024 = 3.0846)
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~567/512 = 178.6944 (~3025/3024 = 3.0846)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, …, 328, 369, 1066cee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, …, 328, 369, 1066cee }}


Badness: 0.064400
Badness: 0.064400
Line 122: Line 122:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~72/65 = 178.9389 (~352/351 = 3.3291)
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~56/55 = 1\41, ~72/65 = 178.9389 (~352/351 = 3.3291)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, …, 328, 369f, 697cef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, …, 328, 369f, 697cef }}


Badness: 0.0416
Badness: 0.0416
Line 135: Line 135:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/54 = 1\41, ~256/231 = 178.3836 (~3024/3025 = 2.7738)
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/54 = 1\41, ~256/231 = 178.3836 (~3024/3025 = 2.7738)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, …, 410, 451, 861e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, …, 410, 451, 861e }}


Badness: 0.100152
Badness: 0.100152
Line 148: Line 148:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/54 = 1\41, ~72/65 = 178.3755 (~352/351 = 2.7657)
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/54 = 1\41, ~72/65 = 178.3755 (~352/351 = 2.7657)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, …, 410, 451, 861e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, …, 410, 451, 861e }}


Badness: 0.0605
Badness: 0.0605
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Countercomp_family"