Factor 9 grid: Difference between revisions
Style, rewrote some text, clarified |
→Factor 9 grid (495 & 666): some more style |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
=== Factor 9 grid (495 & 666) === | === Factor 9 grid (495 & 666) === | ||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.23 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.23 | ||
Comma list: 442/441, 715/714, 2300/2299, 3060/3059, 3179/3174, 9025/9009, 57375/57344 | [[Comma list]]: 442/441, 715/714, 2300/2299, 3060/3059, 3179/3174, 9025/9009, 57375/57344 | ||
[[Mapping]] [[generators]]: ~250/231, ~336/323 | |||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~336/323 = 70.270 | |||
Vals: 171f, 495, 666. | Vals: 171f, 495, 666. | ||
This being said, this temperament preserves more properties of the "Factor 9 Grid" than the corrected version, since it's period-9 and its reduced generator interval | This being said, this temperament preserves more properties of the "Factor 9 Grid" than the corrected version, since it's period-9 and its period minus reduced generator interval also maps to the smallest interval in the Factor 9 Grid system, [[28/27]]. So in the end, 666edo does ironically represent the Factor 9 grid well. The corrected version would be with 495ed15/14 & 666ed15/14, which corresponds to a 4973 & 6691 temperament in the 23-limit: | ||
=== Real Factor 9 grid (4973 & 6691) === | === Real Factor 9 grid (4973 & 6691) === |