Talk:Sane and insane temperaments: Difference between revisions
→No-twos temperaments: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Can a no-twos temperament be sane?--[[User:Moremajorthanmajor|Moremajorthanmajor]] ([[User talk:Moremajorthanmajor|talk]]) 00:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | Can a no-twos temperament be sane?--[[User:Moremajorthanmajor|Moremajorthanmajor]] ([[User talk:Moremajorthanmajor|talk]]) 00:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Sure. For example, all 12edo intervals can be interpreted in 3.5. Btw, glad you start to use talk pages. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: I would like to agree with that: Welcome, Moremajorthanmajor, to the discussion pages! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Relevance == | |||
How often do these come up in practice? "Insane" temperaments seem be to no more than some theoretical pathological case. | |||
As it turns out this is equivalent to the comma basis having torsion, so at best this article can be a sidenote in the relevant article on torsion or saturation. It certainly doesn't need to be included here: [[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Mathematical_Theory]] | |||
- [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 21:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC) | |||