Talk:Chain-of-fifths notation: Difference between revisions

re
m FloraC moved page Talk:Circle-of-fifths notation to Talk:Chain-of-fifths notation: Per discussion on Discord
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


: Inaccuracy of the fifth doesn't technically invalidate the system. It only has to do with how much sense it makes. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
: Inaccuracy of the fifth doesn't technically invalidate the system. It only has to do with how much sense it makes. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
:: Above condition seemed not sufficient to me from a practical standpoint where the relevant intervals (whole tone, semitone, chroma) should have a positive size. I updated the article accordingly. What do you think? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:33, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


== Background of this article ==
== Background of this article ==
Return to "Chain-of-fifths notation" page.