Talk:JI glyphs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage |
→Remove these from interval infoboxes: addition to "Fox" as creator |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
== Remove these from interval infoboxes == | |||
@IlL, @SupahstarSaga, and I have requested to remove those glyphs from interval infoboxes. We've talked to the author of those glyphs, who has revealed it was a dumb idea implemented when they were a teenager, and we've all agreed the glyphs are incomplete and add little point to the pages. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
: I see, but: What exactly is the harm of that "incompleteness" (remember: this is a wiki)? Nobody really complained about having these icons before and there was time invested into them. To be honest, I'd rather like to have some obvious unique features on pages that distinguish them at a glance so I liked to have icons and colors here and there; in the given case these pages were the (in the eyes of newcomers) most basic just intervals. Why was this change made without talking about it ''first''? Why was this talk not reflected ''before''? I find this a bad style (especially when marked as ''minor change'' as done in all but one case by an [https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/IlL by an apparently hyperactive user]). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Yup that's a problem of communication. There's the Discord community who talked about stuff internally, and Inthar is being the representative making the edits here. Surely it's better to have those people all come and participate, so that all the changes are public. The Discord community is disjoint from the FB groups, which is also bad. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
::: Just curious, who made these? I have never known where any of these things originated. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 10:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
:::: Not much info, but he identifies himself as "Fox". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
::::: The images were uploaded by "k9assassin" in March 2015. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
::: @Flora, @Inthar: I think it's rather easy to start editing with a non-empty summary. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:12, 12 April 2021
![]() |
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Remove these from interval infoboxes
@IlL, @SupahstarSaga, and I have requested to remove those glyphs from interval infoboxes. We've talked to the author of those glyphs, who has revealed it was a dumb idea implemented when they were a teenager, and we've all agreed the glyphs are incomplete and add little point to the pages. FloraC (talk) 09:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- I see, but: What exactly is the harm of that "incompleteness" (remember: this is a wiki)? Nobody really complained about having these icons before and there was time invested into them. To be honest, I'd rather like to have some obvious unique features on pages that distinguish them at a glance so I liked to have icons and colors here and there; in the given case these pages were the (in the eyes of newcomers) most basic just intervals. Why was this change made without talking about it first? Why was this talk not reflected before? I find this a bad style (especially when marked as minor change as done in all but one case by an by an apparently hyperactive user). --Xenwolf (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yup that's a problem of communication. There's the Discord community who talked about stuff internally, and Inthar is being the representative making the edits here. Surely it's better to have those people all come and participate, so that all the changes are public. The Discord community is disjoint from the FB groups, which is also bad. FloraC (talk) 10:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Just curious, who made these? I have never known where any of these things originated. Mike Battaglia (talk) 10:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)