Talk:Chalmersia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::: I thought it was "chalmerisma" for the longest time, myself. Since it is the smallest 13-limit superparticular, I propose the more evocative and less confusing '''"mote of chalmers"''' as an alternative name. --[[User:Kaiveran|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran|talk]]) 08:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC) | :::: I thought it was "chalmerisma" for the longest time, myself. Since it is the smallest 13-limit superparticular, I propose the more evocative and less confusing '''"mote of chalmers"''' as an alternative name. --[[User:Kaiveran|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran|talk]]) 08:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
::::: While "mote of chalmers" is an interesting name, I'd still stick with "chalmersia" myself. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:16, 23 July 2021
Sure about the correct spelling?
Chalmersia vs chalmersima vs chalmersma. FloraC (talk) 14:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I just know that "chalmersia" is the spelling used on the Huygens-Fokker Foundation's interval list, so this is the spelling used as the title of the article. However, if there are other alternative spellings, or if there is a dispute about these spellings, those factors should be noted in the article. --Aura (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am only sure that while one is the intended name and most others are mistakes, the name "chalmersma" in particular has a few other hits on this wiki, and Spt3125 has previously gone on record saying they find "chalmersia" to be a bit odd. Because of that, I'm thinking "chalmersma" at least deserves to be acknowledged by means of a redirect page. --Aura (talk) 10:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)