|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| == POTE generator == | | == Undocumented temperament == |
| I am looking for an understandable explanation of POTE generator, the linked POTE tuning (and also Tenney-Euclidean Tuning) doesn't help very much.
| |
|
| |
|
| ...maybe I'm not patient enough or too poor in English, but I cannot find a description in the text. Please help!
| | I was wandering around the temperament finder and found this: http://x31eq.com/cgi-bin/rt.cgi?ets=27+%26+50&limit=7 |
|
| |
|
| - '''xenwolf''' August 26, 2011, 12:37:45 AM UTC-0700
| | It has a name but not documented here. Maybe we add it? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC) |
| ----
| |
| Would it help if I described how to find the POTE tuning in a way which did not attempt to discuss any theory?
| |
|
| |
|
| - '''genewardsmith''' August 27, 2011, 09:57:52 AM UTC-0700
| | :Added 7-limit Oolong. (everything except badness) [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 07:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC) |
| ----
| |
| Yes, a practical help to get done a particulare POTE tuning. Nothing against the theory (and links to theoretical topics will be good), but the way to percept a theory is better, when it starts at the problem. Try first to ask: What is the problem that is solved by this technique (an why is it a problem at all). I think if the problem is not well understood, then the solution either.
| |
|
| |
|
| - '''xenwolf''' August 29, 2011, 12:09:17 AM UTC-0700
| | :: I added the badness (thru my own code). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC) |
| ----
| |
| See what you think now.
| |
|
| |
|
| - '''genewardsmith''' August 29, 2011, 04:23:54 PM UTC-0700 | | I'm extending this temperament to 13-limit cuz there's an obvious mapping for 13. For 11, there's 27p & 77 or 27e & 77. It can be shown 27e & 77 is lowest in badness so I'm going for that. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC) |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| == Temperament Names? == | | == Check EDO lists == |
| Does anyone have any idea why the temperaments have such cool names? Why are there no examples of songs or even samples of the temperament?
| |
|
| |
|
| - '''Cenobyte''' August 25, 2011, 09:50:58 PM UTC-0700
| | FloraC, can you give a short HowTo for checking these lists? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC) |
| ---- | |
| Some time back in the last millenium Herman Miller came up with a scale he called "starling", analysis of which indicated it was based on tempering out 126/125.
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' August 25, 2011, 11:26:39 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Did he know what he was making, or did he just to it intuitively?
| |
| | |
| - '''Cenobyte''' August 27, 2011, 11:30:12 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |