Talk:Diminished family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m FloraC moved page Talk:Dimipent family to Talk:Diminished family: Community consensus |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Ditch ''dimipent'' in favor of ''diminished''? == | == Ditch ''dimipent'' in favor of ''diminished''? == | ||
Given diminished is the only strong septimal extension that makes any sense, this distinction seems unnecessary. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC) | Given diminished is the only strong septimal extension that makes any sense, this distinction seems unnecessary. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
I vote in favor of ditching ''dimipent''. [[User:MisterShafXen|MisterShafXen]] ([[User talk:MisterShafXen|talk]]) 15:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:11, 21 August 2025
Naming conflict
In jubilismic clan there's another extension of {648/625} sharing the name hemidim. FloraC (talk) 11:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Ditch dimipent in favor of diminished?
Given diminished is the only strong septimal extension that makes any sense, this distinction seems unnecessary. FloraC (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
I vote in favor of ditching dimipent. MisterShafXen (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)