Talk:Schisma: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Xenwolf moved page Talk:32805/32768 to Talk:Schisma: rename phone-number like ratio to interval name |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: Good point! Concerning [[kleisma]], I started [[Talk:Kleisma#Disambiguation]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | :: Good point! Concerning [[kleisma]], I started [[Talk:Kleisma#Disambiguation]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
== 887/886 == | |||
> Since it is extremely close to the superparticular ratio 887/886 {{nowrap|(2<sup>-1</sup> 443<sup>-1</sup> 887)}}, it is used interchangably with this interval. | |||
Doesn't seem notable at all. | |||
[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:34, 6 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:34, 6 August 2025
Lemma
Should it better be moved to schisma with 32805/32768 being the redirect? The numbers are hard to memorize, whereas the name is well-established. --Xenwolf (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. If 4-digits is the limit for ratio numbers, then this article definitely needs to be moved. --Aura (talk) 18:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm hesitant as I noticed some (Sagittal notation users in particular) would use the term schisma for a category of commas regarding size, somewhat like diesis. Perhaps there should be a disambiguation. Same for kleisma. FloraC (talk) 08:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Good point! Concerning kleisma, I started Talk:Kleisma#Disambiguation. --Xenwolf (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
887/886
> Since it is extremely close to the superparticular ratio 887/886 (2-1 443-1 887), it is used interchangably with this interval.
Doesn't seem notable at all.