Fractional 3-limit notation: Difference between revisions
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs) →Bad-fifths apotome-fraction notation: Removed unnecessary parentheses |
mNo edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
To obtain the Evo notations, delete the multishaft symbols. There are no equivalent combinations with conventional sharps or flats, as limmas are conventionally notated as the intervals B-C and E-F. The multishaft symbols are not required, even in Revo notation; they merely allow for alternative spellings there. In theory, sharps and flats ''could'' be used with the notations for 33, 40, and 47 because the sharp is one step for them, while it is zero or negative for the other rose EDOs and Sagittal never uses symbols for commas that have been tempered out or tempered negative. But Sagittal recommends not using sharps or flats, conventional or sagittal, with ''any'' limma-fraction notation. | To obtain the Evo notations, delete the multishaft symbols. There are no equivalent combinations with conventional sharps or flats, as limmas are conventionally notated as the intervals B-C and E-F. The multishaft symbols are not required, even in Revo notation; they merely allow for alternative spellings there. In theory, sharps and flats ''could'' be used with the notations for 33, 40, and 47 because the sharp is one step for them, while it is zero or negative for the other rose EDOs and Sagittal never uses symbols for commas that have been tempered out or tempered negative. But Sagittal recommends not using sharps or flats, conventional or sagittal, with ''any'' limma-fraction notation. | ||
== References == | |||
[[Category:Notation]] | [[Category:Notation]] | ||
[[Category:Sagittal notation]] | [[Category:Sagittal notation]] | ||