Talk:General theory: Difference between revisions

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Sintel (talk | contribs)
m link
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{Portal}}
== Are these things really "core concepts"? ==
- Hexany
- Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic
- Equal division of the tritave
- Chord of nature
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
: No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea.
: Regardless, here's my proposal:
* [[Just intonation]]
** [[Harmonic series]]
** [[Harmonic limit]]
** [[Odd limit]]
* [[Scale|Scales]]
** [[Equal division of the octave]]
** [[MOS scale]]
** [[Periods and generators]]
* [[Temperaments]]
** [[Equal temperament]]
** [[Well temperament]]
** [[Regular temperament]]
: Other things to consider: JI: [[just intonation subgroup]], scales: [[step pattern]], maybe [[combination product set]] instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it.
: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Return to "General theory" page.