Talk:General theory: Difference between revisions
→Are these things really "core concepts"?: new section |
m link |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC) | -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC) | ||
: No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea. | |||
: Regardless, here's my proposal: | |||
* [[Just intonation]] | |||
** [[Harmonic series]] | |||
** [[Harmonic limit]] | |||
** [[Odd limit]] | |||
* [[Scale|Scales]] | |||
** [[Equal division of the octave]] | |||
** [[MOS scale]] | |||
** [[Periods and generators]] | |||
* [[Temperaments]] | |||
** [[Equal temperament]] | |||
** [[Well temperament]] | |||
** [[Regular temperament]] | |||
: Other things to consider: JI: [[just intonation subgroup]], scales: [[step pattern]], maybe [[combination product set]] instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it. | |||
: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC) | |||