Talk:Just intonation: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, Sysops
1,399 edits
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
m This should work fine without {{clear}} now
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{High priority}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
{{WSArchiveLink}}
 
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
 
----
 
== JI ==
I created a new article by going back to an older version of this one, because I don't like this article (a lot of useless blah blah blah so far as I can see) but other people do. So let's have two articles!
 
- '''genewardsmith''' January 29, 2012, 03:11:40 AM UTC-0800
----
Thank you.  I was trying to clean up the old one, but I was afraid people would get mad if I removed their sentences entirely.  We definitely need something concise and to the point.
 
- '''Sarzadoce''' January 29, 2012, 02:42:21 PM UTC-0800
----
 
== omission of JI propaganda statement. ==
It does not serve the unbiased nature to have such a thing included.
 
One could as easily say that those  that temper become troubled by those who point out that temperments can be appox. by  JI.
 
- '''kraiggrady''' November 01, 2010, 04:31:27 AM UTC-0700
----
Yes Kraig, I agree with your removing that section.  I'm less interested in th "biased/unbiased" argument than simply th argument that "them's fightin' words."  Phrases in particular: "some people", "pig-headed", "quasi-religious", etc.  I don't want to welcome that kind of verbal violence in this community.
 
If somebody wants to write an opinionated article on another page, add a link to it on th JI page, and sign their name to it, that would be different, imho.
 
Not that there are any policies in place....
 
- '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' November 01, 2010, 12:05:15 PM UTC-0700
----
We can't jump from an "a,b,c" definition to neologism-laden filligreed stuff in the same paragraph. This is tantamount to simply writing "go away, sane folk!"
 
- '''lobawad''' July 04, 2011, 02:04:28 AM UTC-0700
----

Latest revision as of 16:11, 14 April 2025

This article is deemed to be of high priority for the Xenharmonic Wiki, as it is often seen by new users or easily accessed from the main page or sidebar. Edits made to this article will have a significantly larger impact than on others, and poorly-written content will stand out more. As a result, it has been semi-protected to prevent disruptive editing and vandalism.

Please be mindful of this when making edits to the article.

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Just_intonation&oldid=192111"