Talk:Just intonation/WikispacesArchive

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:Just intonation.


I created a new article by going back to an older version of this one, because I don't like this article (a lot of useless blah blah blah so far as I can see) but other people do. So let's have two articles!

- genewardsmith January 29, 2012, 03:11:40 AM UTC-0800

Thank you. I was trying to clean up the old one, but I was afraid people would get mad if I removed their sentences entirely. We definitely need something concise and to the point.

- Sarzadoce January 29, 2012, 02:42:21 PM UTC-0800

omission of JI propaganda statement.

It does not serve the unbiased nature to have such a thing included.

One could as easily say that those  that temper become troubled by those who point out that temperments can be appox. by  JI.

- kraiggrady November 01, 2010, 04:31:27 AM UTC-0700

Yes Kraig, I agree with your removing that section. I'm less interested in th "biased/unbiased" argument than simply th argument that "them's fightin' words." Phrases in particular: "some people", "pig-headed", "quasi-religious", etc. I don't want to welcome that kind of verbal violence in this community.

If somebody wants to write an opinionated article on another page, add a link to it on th JI page, and sign their name to it, that would be different, imho.

Not that there are any policies in place....

- Andrew_Heathwaite November 01, 2010, 12:05:15 PM UTC-0700

We can't jump from an "a,b,c" definition to neologism-laden filligreed stuff in the same paragraph. This is tantamount to simply writing "go away, sane folk!"

- lobawad July 04, 2011, 02:04:28 AM UTC-0700