Talk:Superpartient ratio: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "= Typo in the last sentence? = Does n really mean both epimoricity and epimericity? -~~~~" |
Header levels, reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Typo in the last sentence? = | == Typo in the last sentence? == | ||
Does n really mean both epimoricity and epimericity? -[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 03:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC) | Does n really mean both epimoricity and epimericity? -[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 03:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I believe it's a typo. To be honest, if "degree of epimoricity" is a neologism like I think it is (and like a quick Google search seems to confirm), I would suggest revising that terminology, as discussed here: [[Talk:Abc, high quality commas, and epimericity]]. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:10, 2 March 2023
Typo in the last sentence?
Does n really mean both epimoricity and epimericity? -TallKite (talk) 03:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I believe it's a typo. To be honest, if "degree of epimoricity" is a neologism like I think it is (and like a quick Google search seems to confirm), I would suggest revising that terminology, as discussed here: Talk:Abc, high quality commas, and epimericity. --Fredg999 (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)